iPhone Geek

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Which console has better graphics?

  1. Quote Originally Posted by theGOHN View Post
    plus the PS3 uses the Cell Processor with 7 SPEs, at 3.2 GHz, xbox Custom IBM PowerPC CPU with 3 symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz, they dif. is with the ps3 its spread out to 7 SPEs so if the dev. would use those the right way all those games would be better on PS3
    Then tell me why a good majority of multiplatform games run at a higher framerate on the Xbox 360? I'm sure you wouldn't want to take 2-3x as long completing a game just to improve the graphics. It's possible on the PS3, but current games suggest that the only edge they have over the 360 in graphics is the shading, as in it's much darker.

    As well, your source is completely invalid, not credible. I have never heard of play.tm, and it does not look like a site too on top of their information. They are very false and illiterate.
    Last edited by Payne; 12-11-2008 at 09:39 AM.

  2. i dont wana comment on the technical jargon.
    but from experience i wud vote for xbox..

  3. Because 360 is the lead playform for all those games save the few that pc is lead for. its just lazy programming
    Unhappy with the quality of Skate for the PS3? The producers apparently felt the same way -- developer Black Box has stated Skate 2's lead platform
    from Skate 2's lead platform will be the PS3 - PS3 Fanboy

  4. The answer appears to be that meeting technical specifications is no longer an issue for games where development led on the PS3 – but where development was either parallel or started on the 360, there's still a notable lag in speed and quality.
    From Counting Rupees: Take me to your lead platform - Joystiq is that beeter?

  5. To be honest, it doesn't matter what uses more GHz or whatever the case may be. It only looks good or bad in the eye of the beholder, not how much this or that is put into the system. Now, PS3 may have better quality, but I favor Xbox since they use there quality better than PS3 does.

  6. Quote Originally Posted by Nightshine View Post
    To be honest, it doesn't matter what uses more GHz or whatever the case may be. It only looks good or bad in the eye of the beholder, not how much this or that is put into the system. Now, PS3 may have better quality, but I favor Xbox since they use there quality better than PS3 does.
    Thats fine you can have you oppinion but he was arguing hardware so thats what i did.

  7. Quote Originally Posted by theGOHN View Post
    Thats fine you can have you oppinion but he was arguing hardware so thats what i did.
    I wasn't arguing anything about hardware. Get your facts straight.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Payne View Post
    I wasn't arguing anything about hardware. Get your facts straight.
    i wasnt talkin about you

  9. Quote Originally Posted by theGOHN View Post
    i wasnt talkin about you
    You're right. You weren't talking about me. You were talking to me.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by Payne View Post
    You're right. You weren't talking about me. You were talking to me.
    no i was talking to this guy
    Nightshine
    Junior Member

    and i was talking about this guy

    Comeaudodragon
    Junior Member
    his point was hardware

    did you read this thead?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC1 PL1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135