Thread: Sony or microsoft

you dont need a bluetooh ,and in any case a large # of adults would already have a bluetooth for their phone ,if they dont they can buy one with the $ they save on the wifi adapter . then your lookin at $30 to $60 dollers for a game, some good games just went down in price and there are lots of used games out there if they dont want to pay full price for a game . if your going to buy a console you will buy games at some point weather the console came with games or not, and in the case of your 360 deal they are not games anyone is in a real hurry to play anyway. It comes down to witch one looks better and as soon as developers start useing PS3 as lead platform and they stop pumping out half assed ports it will be hard to say PS3 does not look as good as 360 if not better.

Originally Posted by theGOHN

you dont need a bluetooh ,and in any case a large # of adults would already have a bluetooth for their phone ,if they dont they can buy one with the $ they save on the wifi adapter . then your lookin at $30 to $60 dollers for a game, some good games just went down in price and there are lots of used games out there if they dont want to pay full price for a game . if your going to buy a console you will buy games at some point weather the console came with games or not, and in the case of your 360 deal they are not games anyone is in a real hurry to play anyway. It comes down to witch one looks better and as soon as developers start useing PS3 as lead platform and they stop pumping out half assed ports it will be hard to say PS3 does not look as good as 360 if not better.

No it does not. PS3 is not better because developers wouldn't want to waste time on a system that sold what...under 400k units compared to the 360s 850k in November? 360 is easy money for developers to make money on...and it supports great technology. Tell me, if you could make more money porting a PS3 exclusive to the 360, or making an exclusive to the 360, would you? I.E- Square Enix porting FFXIII to the 360, and putting more JRPGs onto it than PS3. Konami is likely to port some older/new Metal Gear games onto it too.

the fact that 360 sold more units than PS3 comes down to one thing, marketing and ill give you this, as far as marketing gose microsoft has sony beat. but i if sony would have put as much $ into marketing as microsoft did the shoe would be on the outher foot, and just because you see one system on tv more than another dosent make it better, it just means they bought more commercial time.

I don't really have a favorite...I like my Sony PS3 and I like my 360...I think they have different things to offer but I like them both equally....Although I might have to say the graphics are a wee bit better on most games with the 360.....

i think micsoft becasue once i tried the xbox i was hooked

Originally Posted by Comeaudodragon

wrong, PS3 doesn`t have even half of the online features that Xbox 360 has. on PS3 online while in multiplayer, you cannot do any of the following: view friends list, send friend requests, send cross-game invites, have cross-game voice chats, view player profiles, or have someone join

Ehhhh WRONG!! You can do ALL of those exept the voice chats and the joining, but certain games you can. All the rest you can do.

microsoft seems better and more popular ecause of xbox live. microsoft

easily hands down microsoft wins

I think you go for sony. Because sony is good in technology and quality services.